Finite subcover lemma

A compact set has a finite subcover for every open cover
Finite subcover lemma

Finite subcover lemma: Let (X,d)(X,d) be a and let KXK\subseteq X be . If {Uα}αA\{U_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in A} is an cover of KK, meaning KαAUα, K\subseteq \bigcup_{\alpha\in A} U_\alpha, then there exist α1,,αNA\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_N\in A such that KUα1UαN. K\subseteq U_{\alpha_1}\cup\cdots\cup U_{\alpha_N}.

This is the defining operational feature of compactness and is used as a “black box” step in many arguments: convert infinitely many local pieces into finitely many.

Examples:

  • The [0,1][0,1] is compact, so any open cover of [0,1][0,1] contains a finite subcover.
  • The open interval (0,1)(0,1) is not compact: the cover {(1/n,1):nN}\{(1/n,1):n\in\mathbb{N}\} has no finite subcover.